Subject Experts Solutions for Chapter: Analytical and Logical Reasoning, Exercise 4: Practice Exercise
Subject Experts Logical Reasoning Solutions for Exercise - Subject Experts Solutions for Chapter: Analytical and Logical Reasoning, Exercise 4: Practice Exercise
Attempt the free practice questions on Chapter 11: Analytical and Logical Reasoning, Exercise 4: Practice Exercise with hints and solutions to strengthen your understanding. Self Study Guide Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) for Logical Reasoning solutions are prepared by Experienced Embibe Experts.
Questions from Subject Experts Solutions for Chapter: Analytical and Logical Reasoning, Exercise 4: Practice Exercise with Hints & Solutions
Directions: In question below are given two statements numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
I. All boys are tall.
II. All Punjabi are tall.

Directions: In question below are given two statements numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
I. All girls go to the college.
II. Rina does not go to the college.

Directions: Two statements are given below followed by two conclusions (I and II). You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the conclusions, if any, follow from the given statement:
Statements
All students like excursions.
Some students go for higher education.
Conclusions
I. Students who go for higher education also like excursions.
II. Some students do not go for higher education, but like excursions.

Directions: Two statements are given below followed by two conclusions (I and II). You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the conclusions, if any, follow from the given statement:
Statements
All good hockey players are in the Indian hockey team.
'X' is not a good hockey player.
Conclusions
I. 'X' is not in the Indian Hockey team.
II. 'X' wants to be in the Indian Hockey team.

Directions: In the following question, a part of the sentence is underlined. Alternatives to the underlined part are given in the options, which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative. In case no improvement is needed, select 'No improvement' as your answer.
He has not and can never be in the good books of his employer because he lacks honesty.

Directions: Each question comprises two statements (numbered as I and II). You have to take the statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
I. Some beautiful women are actresses.
II. All actresses are good dancers.
Which of the following derivations is correct?

Direction: Identify the answer which is the correct inference of the following questions. Assume the statement to be true.
If you are serious you must work.
You are not serious, you do not work.

Direction: Identify the answer which is the correct inference of the following questions. Assume the statement to be true.
All honest people are rogues. All rogues are politicians.
So, politicians are honest.
