Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
I. Some pens are sharpener.
II. All pen is a pencil.
Conclusions:
I. Some pencils are pen.
II. All sharpener is a pen.

In the following question, two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions and assumptions if any, follow from the given statement.

Statements:
No man is a Donkey.
Rahul is a man. 

Conclusions:
I. Rahul is not a donkey.
II. All men are not Rahul.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements.

Statements:

$1.$ Some animals are elephants.

$2.$ Some elephants are tigers.

Conclusions:

I. Some animals are tigers.

II. No tiger is an animal.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:

1 All pens are cups.

II. All cups are chairs.

Conclusions:

I. All pens are chairs.

II. Some cups are pens. 

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

All chair are expensive.

All expensive are unique.

Conclusions:

I. All chairs are unique.

II. All unique are expensive.

In each question below are three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even.if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
No door is a window.
No rack is a door.
All cupboards are windows.

Conclusions:
I. Some cupboards are racks.
II. No cupboard is a door.
III. No rack is a window.

In each question below are two statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the two given statements to be true even.if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
No introvert is an extrovert.
All extroverts are ambiverts.

Conclusions:
$\mathrm{I}.$ No introvert is an ambivert.
$\mathrm{II}.$ No ambivert is an introvert.
$\mathrm{III}.$ Some ambiverts are extroverts.
$\mathrm{IV}.$ All ambiverts are extroverts.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

$1.$ All dogs are lions.

$2.$ No elephant is a lion.

Conclusion:

I. No dog is an elephant.

II. No lion is a dog.

III. Some elephants are dogs.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion logically follow(s) from the statements. 

Statements:
All ministers are politicians.
All pilots are ministers.
No engineer is a politician.
Conclusions:
I. Some ministers are pilots.
II. No engineer is a minister.
III. No engineer is a pilot.

Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

Some rivers are brooks.

No brook is a stream.

Conclusions:

I. No stream is a brook.

II. Some streams are rivers.

III. Some brooks are rivers.

Statements

I. All watches are ornaments.

II. All clocks are watches.

Conclusions

I. All ornaments are clocks.

II. All clocks are ornaments.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements.

Statement:
All lemons are pulms.
All pulms are dates.
Some dates are mangoes.

Conclusions:
I.Some lemons are mangoes.
II. Some mangoes are pulms.
III. All lemons are dates.
IV. Some mangoes are dates.

In each of the following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions numbered $\mathrm{I}$ and $\mathrm{II}$. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
Some metals are irons.
Some irons are heavy.

Conclusions:
$\mathrm{I}.$ All irons are metals.
$\mathrm{II}.$ All heavy are metals.

Statements:

(i) All microprocessors are computers.
(ii) All computers are modems.

Conclusions:

I. All micro-processors are modems.
II. All modems are micro-processors.
III. All modems are computers.
IV. Some computers are microprocessors.

Statements:

(i) Gold is ductile.
(ii) This substance is not ductile.

Conclusions:

I. This substance is not gold.
II. Gold is not ductile.
III. Ductiles are not gold.
IV. No substance is ductile.

Statements:

(i) Some actors are doctors.
(ii) All architects are doctors.

Conclusions:

I. All actors are doctors.
II. Some architects are doctors.
III. All doctors are actors.
IV. Some actors are architects.